![Dave erickson dave erickson media](https://knopkazmeya.com/10.png)
![dave erickson dave erickson media dave erickson dave erickson media](http://ww1.prweb.com/prfiles/2016/05/18/13427423/daveprofile.jpg)
![dave erickson dave erickson media dave erickson dave erickson media](https://www.thewrap.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/ftwd.jpg)
¶ 3 The next day of the proceedings, before the prospective jurors' orientation, the trial court noted that the questionnaire “looked good.” III RP at 185. And then ask them whether or not any of them want to be talked to privately so we get an idea as to how many of those we might have. Give them a suggested time frame which is liberal, and be sure they can accommodate us for the time frame, and factor in some deliberation time into that. I guess the main from my perspective, are that you have a list of witnesses in there so the jurors can respond to that that you ask them whether or not there's any reason that they might not be fair and impartial so we get that kind of broad, general question in. I will probably add some questions, based on what had, and I don't think got major problems about questions that I had.” II RP at 179. Defense counsel replied, “I don't think that will be a problem, Your Honor. I haven't had an opportunity to discuss that with. We both drafted one that we exchanged, and I think they're pretty similar. The prosecutor responded, “I'm hopeful that and I can agree on one that we can present to the Court. Before trial, the court asked whether the parties wanted to give the prospective jurors a questionnaire before beginning voir dire. ¶ 2 The State charged Erickson with two counts of first degree child rape. He argues that the trial court denied him his constitutional right to public trial by allowing private questioning of prospective jurors. ¶ 1 David Erickson appeals his conviction of two counts of first degree child rape. Karen Anne Watson, Pierce County Prosecutor's Office, Tacoma, WA, for Respondent. Decided: July 29, 2008ĭavid Bruce Koch, Andrew Peter Zinner, Nielsen Broman & Koch PLLC, Seattle, WA, for Appellant. Court of Appeals of Washington,Division 2.
![Dave erickson dave erickson media](https://knopkazmeya.com/10.png)